The Tempest, the last play Shakespeare wrote without a collaborator, has become a key text in school and university curricula, not simply in early modern literature courses but in postcolonial and history programs as well. One of Shakespeare's most frequently performed plays, The Tempest is also of great interest to a general audience. This volume will outline the play's most important critical issues and suggest new avenues of research in a format accessible to students, teachers, and the general reader.

The Tempest: A Critical Reader A Critical Reader
by Vaughan, Virginia Mason; Vaughan, Alden T.-
Receive Free Shipping To The More Store!*
*Marketplace items do not qualify for the free shipping promotion.
-
eCampus.com Device Compatibility Matrix
Click the device icon to install or view instructions
Buy New
Rent Textbook
Rent Digital
Used Textbook
We're Sorry
Sold Out
How Marketplace Works:
- This item is offered by an independent seller and not shipped from our warehouse
- Item details like edition and cover design may differ from our description; see seller's comments before ordering.
- Sellers much confirm and ship within two business days; otherwise, the order will be cancelled and refunded.
- Marketplace purchases cannot be returned to eCampus.com. Contact the seller directly for inquiries; if no response within two days, contact customer service.
- Additional shipping costs apply to Marketplace purchases. Review shipping costs at checkout.
Summary
Author Biography
Alden T. Vaughan is Professor Emeritus of History at Columbia University
Table of Contents
2. The Tempest Timeline: Editor
This chapter will begin with an extensive history of The Tempest's critical reception from the Restoration to the mid-twentieth century. As the title suggests, it will demonstrate how each age's interpretation was based on what went before , yet modified in light of new historical and political circumstances. In the process this chapter will show how changing cultural contexts affected aesthetic judgments about the play as well as modes of representation in the theatre and other media. John Dryden's and William Davenant's 1660 adaptation, The Tempest, or, The Enchanted Island, for example, superimposed onto Shakespeare's text the political concerns of the newly restored king Charles II and re-shaped it in accord with neo-classical aesthetic principles. The fates of the island's blended family --Prospero, Miranda, Caliban and Ariel - and the various ways their interactions have been interpreted will be key to this discussion. Changing attitudes toward language, whether focused on Prospero's famous speeches, Ariel's songs, censorship of Miranda's more assertive lines, or Caliban's monologs and freedom song, will be highlighted as well. The chapter will take the discussion through the impact of Charles Darwin's theories on interpretations of Caliban, the rediscovery of Prospero's psychological wounds in the aftermath of Freudian psychology, and a renewed awareness of Prospero's "art" as technology in the 1950s. Throughout, this chapter will demonstrate how subsequent generations have re-interpreted The Tempest in light of their own ideological and aesthetic concerns.
5. Performance History: "The Performance History of Polytext Tempest." Eckart Voigts- Virchow, University of Siegen
6. "The Tempest in Current Critical Research." Tobias Döring, University of Munich
7. New Directions
a. "The Tempest's Genesis." Andrew Gurr, University of Reading
The Tempest is easily the least source-reliant play of any by Shakespeare. It raises the question most acutely of why he chose the sources he did use - perhaps Strachey's letter about the shipwreck at Bermuda, certainly Virgil, Ovid, and Montaigne, and most likely Jonson's Hymenaei for Prospero's masque. What he did with these sources raises the most basic of questions about what was in his mind when he started to write the play, and what the sources he opted to use gave to this aspect of his work. This essay analyses some of these uses, including most conspicuously the Strachey letter, and assesses all of the chosen sources to examine what he had in mind when composing the play.
b. "Worlds on Worlds - The Politics of Romance in The Tempest.' Brinda Charry, Keene State University
It was not until the nineteenth century that The Tempest was described as a "romance," first by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, but it is a designation that has persisted. This essay will examine the implications of this generic categorization on the play's language and structure and more specifically, on the work it does as socio-political discourse. Although George Puttenham mentions romances in The Arte of English Poesie, he refers to them with some condescension as "stories of old time." So how does Shakespeare look to the (literary) past, into the "dark backward and abysm of time" (1.2.50) and find fresh material? Identifying features of the medieval romance include its setting (far removed in time and space from the real), the protagonist's movement through this space, and the resulting transformation of both self and the landscape. This essay will argue that these literary motifs are politicized in the Shakespeare text and particularly allow the playwright to engage with the complexities of Europe's engagement with North Africa and the Muslim world. It will also argue that the romance genre allows for the island to be nowhere and everywhere at the same time. As a result both Old World (i.e. the Mediterranean) and New World readings of the island can coexist and interrogate each other, leading to a complex understanding of both Renaissance cross-cultural engagement and of the Renaissance's uses of romance.
c. "Telling Fool from Clown in The Tempest." Helen Whall, College of the Holy Cross
No matter how approximate the chronology of is works, Shakespeare deliberately positions plays within plays from the beginning to the end of his career that reveal an evolving attitude toward stage comedy. In The Taming of the Shrew, A Midsummer Night's Dream, Hamlet, and The Tempest, general claims about dramatic representation remain fairly consistent. But over the course of the canon Shakespeare's consideration of comic technique - more than of comedy itself - becomes increasingly troubled. Some have speculated that Shakespeare's growing discontent with clowns reflects his anger with Will Kempe, who abruptly left the Lord Chamberlain's Men about the time Hamlet was being staged. This essay will argue that although Kempe may well have played a part in provoking Shakespeare's distaste for clowns who improvise, it was more his new understanding of Italianate commedia dell'arte that led to his rejection of a comic manner, not comedic method, in The Tempest. Shakespeare never demonstrates more profoundly his appreciation for the fool's 'infinite jest' than he does in The Tempest. In that play, however, he also most explicitly outlines the dangers of clowning as embodied in Stephano and Trinculo. The warnings introduced in Hamlet seem to have grown darker as Shakespeare distinguished between the clowning of medieval allegory and the improvisation nature of commedia. Recent scholarship has bolstered suggestions made as early as 1901 that Shakespeare at some point knew more about the commedia than can be explained by native source material. The parallels in plot between The Tempest and Flaminia la Scala's 1611 collection of commedia scenario have become compelling, especially when matched up against similar work showing the relationship of Othello to other commedia plots. This essay will review existing criticism about Shakespeare and commedia dell'arte in order to map out a few locales where others might yet find evidence for Shakespeare's knowledge not just of plots but of actual commedia acting conventions. It is here, in the elusive, transient world of performance, that The Tempest makes Shakespeare's strongest statement about any human's regrettable tendency to 'act like a clown'.
d. "The Great Globe, or, Our Little Life: Scientific Romance and Speculative Realism in The Tempest." Scott Maisano, University of Massachusetts at Boston
It is no accident that The Tempest begins with a dramatization of what Lucretius presents as the ideal of comfort -standing on solid ground and observing others struggling at sea—nor that Prospero uses the occasion to instruct his daughter, who is traumatized by the apparent shipwreck, to "Be collected" and "have comfort" (1.2.13, 25). The goal of atomistic philosophy, according to both Epicurus and Lucretius, is attaining the state of ataraxia or tranquility of mind. Toward the end of the play, in his "revels speech," Prospero speculates on the emergence and extinction of humanity within an infinite and aleatory universe. This essay argues that Prospero's "great globe itself" does not refer to the terrestrial globe, the earth, but rather to the celestial globe, the heavens; from there, it proposes that Prospero's "revels speech" doubles as a theory of everything in which the audience (both onstage and off) discovers that all perceptible entities, from the outermost celestial sphere to our inmost mental images, are composed of a singular, imperceptible, but nonetheless physical "stuff": Epicurean atoms. Most importantly, it suggests that Prospero is an experimental atomist, who not only sees but reaches into and manipulates the most miniscule, invisible Lucretian "elements" of nature. The essay will draw on provocative primary and secondary materials, including but not limited to Thomas Digges's A Perfit Description of the Celestiall Orbs (1577), Aldous Huxley's Brave New World (1932), Eugene Thacker's After Life (2010), and Gerard Passannante's The Lucretian Renaissance (2011).
8. Resources: N. Amos Rothschild, Boston University
An electronic version of this book is available through VitalSource.
This book is viewable on PC, Mac, iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch, and most smartphones.
By purchasing, you will be able to view this book online, as well as download it, for the chosen number of days.
Digital License
You are licensing a digital product for a set duration. Durations are set forth in the product description, with "Lifetime" typically meaning five (5) years of online access and permanent download to a supported device. All licenses are non-transferable.
More details can be found here.
A downloadable version of this book is available through the eCampus Reader or compatible Adobe readers.
Applications are available on iOS, Android, PC, Mac, and Windows Mobile platforms.
Please view the compatibility matrix prior to purchase.